Posts Tagged ‘mccain’

The world is coming to an end… have we learned nothing?

November 9th, 2008
No Gravatar

I heard a quote that I love the other day. It says that “history does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” Now it took me a few minutes to totally appreciate that quote. I’m not a history buff, but I do know that every 4 years during election years there is always volatility in the economy. Jobs are lost, stocks waiver and reporters tell us how the world is going to end if the person they don’t like doesn’t win. I’m not sure about you but when I was a child I was read a story about Chicken little who went around telling everyone “the sky is falling.” Isn’t this the same thing? Fox news who claims they are fair and balanced was behind McCain and every chance they had would bash Obama. CNN who backed Obama would support him and bash McCain when they could. You almost have to watch both channels all the time to get a truly “fair and balanced” perspective. 

It really isn’t the end of the world no matter who wins. Frankly both Obama and McCain scare me, but then again it’s because they are politicians. There is a history of politicians telling you what you want to hear and delivering very little. So to me hearing what they “want to do” doesn’t matter much. It really is more about the person and how I believe they would react to various situations. 

So now Obama won by a landslide, and I think it’s for two reasons. First because he had one heck of a campaign. I mean this guy sold himself like no other. McCain on the other hand didn’t sell himself. It’s like he was running the worst campaign ever. I wonder if he even wanted to win. You would think that he would have been more visual, he would do more to get his name and face out. Did you know that Obama even went so far to create an iPhone/iPod touch app for his campaign? That was genius! You can tell which candidate was more knowledgeable with current technology by how it was utilized in the election. And with both of them wanting to digitize health records to save costs perhaps it is more beneficial to have someone who can actually use a computer. Heck Obama has several quotes showing he uses Youtube. 

The second reason I think Obama won was because of the current republican party. People are just sick and tired of the same thing. Every day we turn on the TV and hear about billions more being spent on wars over seas while our economy tanks. I don’t believe in handing people money, but I do believe that we have plenty of homeless and others in our own nation that need assistance. And because no one but “the other guy” is being helped americans are sick of it.

Regardless who won the economy is in bad shape. And regardless who won it will continue to be for sometime. It does irritate me that both Obama and McCain voted for the $700 billion dollar bail out plan that had to be completed within a week to save the world. And now they are still figuring out what to do with the money. And of the money they distributed AIG used some to take 2 retreat/meetings. And other banks are sitting on it for “tougher times” as it said in one article I read. That’s right, we as tax payers appear to have paid $700 billion to give banks more money to sit on so they have reserves and extra cash to buy up their competitors when they fail. So I’m so glad that the money we are all paying for is being put to good use. Of course this was passed weeks ago and the economy is even worse now then it was…. So tell me how exactly did the bail out work? But have no fear, a second stimulus package might be passed soon so that’s even more money we get to throw down the drain! Woohoo.

Here’s my bailout plan. The companies that are failing, let them fail. Will it hurt the economy? Sure it will. But tell me isn’t it pretty lousy now? Companies that are not fiscally responsible should not be rewarded by being handed cash. They should be allowed to fail and other companies should take them over. Isn’t this what the saying “only the strong survive” means? When the world is deregulated as much as it was allowed to be this is bound to happen. The company I work for almost went under. Did the government throw us money? Nope. Instead we had to go through bankruptcy court, restructure and lost a lot of jobs, closed 107 stores and had to correct our mistakes. If we were buddies with anyone in Washington we probably could have continued doing business as usual which would have ultimately lost more money because we wouldn’t have changed our business practices. But we did and now are doing decent taken into account the economy.  I believe that throwing money at the problem will only delay the inevitable, businesses must fail, others must change their ways of doing business to survive. It’s a little something called evolution.

You can see the picture here that shows why businesses fail. It’s because they quit trying, they quit working. CEO’s get greedy, workers quit caring.

Another plan of action for my bail out plan. Rather then handing out money to people in the form of welfare that would stop immediately. There is to much trash on the streets, to many things that need to be done and I think if people want welfare the government should put them in community service type jobs and make them EARN  the money. Hmmm, earning money by working for it? What a concept! And I know there are some that can’t work physical jobs, so in home programs could be setup like data entry, making phone calls, envelope stuffing or other low impact jobs. Hell even make these people write a paper on what they will do with the money when they get it, and how it will better their lives. I bet most of those on welfare would refuse to work, but then they shouldn’t get the welfare check. After all, why am I paying for sally joe bob to stay at home with her 14 kids watching Jerry springer while I’m working 40-50 hours a week? People would stop getting handouts for doing nothing if I was in charge. The programs would still be available, but you would have to do something to get your check. Work, right a paper, just something. 

But I digress. I’m tired of everyone bashing Obama and McCain. Am I happy with how it all turned out? I’m impartial. Do I think that good things are coming? Definitely, in fact I wish that we could start early with the president-elect. But then again no matter who won my attitude is the same. The reason is because regardless who won the election, these bumps would be happening, the stock market will waiver, but like a cold give it a little while without medication and it will heal itself. Treat it with the incorrect medicine and it only gets worse, and a government who has got us into so much debt in the last 8 years apparently only knows how to treat problems in one of two ways, going to war with it, or throwing money at it, then there is always the hybrid of going to war and throwing money. Treat it correctly and it will be healed in a very short amount of time. So hopefully there is a plan now that doesn’t include throwing money at the problem and instead actually focuses on fixing it.  But people just need to keep in mind that history rhymes. Every time there is an election year things get bad, come December or January everything will most likely be just fine. 

But in the meantime, I’m enjoying the $2.09 a gallon gas. I’m contemplating taking some money and putting it in the stock market. After all, with stocks this low it’s a great time to buy! This part of the economic cycle is when people that make the right decisions can make serious money. It’s everyone with the “sky is falling” attitude that is killing it. Why not just yell “FIRE!!” in a crowded theatre?

  • Share/Bookmark

Voting Schedule to ease the demand at polling places.

November 3rd, 2008
No Gravatar

I saw this today at work and wanted to post it since it seems like a good idea to help resolve the long lines, etc at the polling places. ;)

Good Morning,

As I’m sure you’re already aware, tomorrow is election day. Voting is a privilege that is important to me and I hope it is important to everyone. I would like for everyone to know that if you need to arrive to work a few minutes late or leave a few minutes early so that you have enough time to get to the polls, you’re encouraged to do so. All I ask is that you be sure to make your Supervisor or Manager aware of your plans.

Also, I think it’s important that everyone remember the new voting schedule this year. So that the polling places will not be overly crowded, I think I heard somewhere that if you’re voting for McCain, you should vote on Tuesday and if you’re voting for Obama, you should wait and vote on Wednesday.
——
Get it? Is funny!

Thanks,

  • Share/Bookmark

This pretty much sums it up…

October 23rd, 2008
No Gravatar

  • Share/Bookmark

Do I think we need a tax increase?

October 17th, 2008
No Gravatar

I have learned that this election really isn’t about the issues. People don’t seem to care about anything except who has the best tax plan. Sure Obama had potential ties with a domestic terrorist. Sure McCain maybe can a little help from Verizon and AT&T who both erectedmobile cell towers at his ranch that in one report said was free (telecom companies showing favoritism? say it aint so.)  Sure both of them spent a trillion dollars in a week. But no one seems to care about that, they just want to know who will give them a better tax break?

My response to that is I don’t know. What I do know is that we are in an economic situation right now where we owe a ton of money to China and other foreign countries.  The Fed keeps lowering the interest rate and now I believe it’s at 1.5%, it used to be up in the 7% range so when they lowered it yeah it had an impact, it actually MEANT something. I wouldn’t be surprised if they lower it another .25%-.5% . It’s going to really be a bad day when they hit 0% and have no leverage anymore. But then again, at 1.5% how much leverage do they have currently?

The issue we have now is our government keeps lowering everything… Except spending that is.

It seems like our governments mentality is that taxes should go down,  interest rate should be reduced to increase lending. And while we are getting less money into our government let’s spend a trillion dollars to bail out our friends on wall street. I ask this to you, where exactly is that money coming from? Certainly we don’t have an abundance of money. After all we have a huge national debt. And if we did have all that extra money wouldn’t it have been a much wiser decision to spend it on fixing the broken systems of America like ohh say Social Security, a system I have paid into since I was 16 years old and working and yet will NEVER see a dime from it? And some say, there is a chance you will. Well I read yesterday they are boosting some of the handouts they are giving to help those struggling which if my math is correct means it will be depleted even faster. Guess I need to get a second job so my neighbor can continue getting her check.

I don’t think we need a tax break or cut. I say raise taxes…on certian conditions. Do I really want to give my money to the government? Not at this time. But, if the government was more fiscally responsible I would have no issue at all paying more money to live in this country and make it a better place. but it seems like the more we put in the less we get out of it.

For example, AIG was given billions on 2 occasions by the government to help bail them out. Almost immediately the company took a $400,000 break and booked a resort where they could “talk about the problems.”

Isn’t that what they have a giant building with board rooms for? And what part of “talking about the problems” require you to get thousands in Spa and massage charges? Ohh I’m sorry I guess the stress of your friends in Washington handing you billions was too much.

Then AIG asked for more money and the government gave em more. And guess what, AIG executives took a hunting trip that racked up another $100,000+ in debt. 

So I ask you Mr. Government what are you going to do to punish these people? You see I have no problem paying more money to you to help better the country in which we live. I don’t believe in socialism or elitism. I believe that you get what you give in life. I’m tired of poor people that don’t go get jobs and rely on food stamps complaining that they can’t make it, no jobs are available etc. I say quit being a victim and go make something out of your life. The government needs to quit supporting these people, they need to quit giving money to the rich for bailouts and they need to start showing the working class that the money they are paying in is doing some good.

You want to know how ridiculous the government is? A few months ago my wife needed a new laptop so we did some research looking for a great deal. After a few weeks I found that Office Depot had a great tablet PC (HP brand) on sale for $600. We went down and found they only had the display model left so I asked for an additional discount, after rebates and discounts we walked out with a $900 laptop for $500. Not a bad deal. My neighbor who works for the government was issued a similar laptop recently, guess how much the government paid who by the way buys in bulk so additional discounts should be awarded to them and not have the prices jacked up! They didn’t pay $500, not even $750. Nor did they pay $900, $1500 not even close. The government instead paid $2000+ for a similar laptop to the one my wife now has and they paid 4 times what they should have paid for 1. But since they bought in bulk I would think they should have gotten it even cheaper.

And we wonder why we have debt as a nation?

Let’s see someone in Washington have the guts to talk about financial responsibility. Let’s see our tax money being spent wisely and then I don’t care to pay more taxes to help the country rebound. What we don’t need are more cuts to drive us deeper into debt UNLESS we as a nation file bankruptcy and call a “do over.” Wouldn’t that be nice?

Come to think of it, we are the strongest nation in the world. We always help other people. Why don’t we charge the countries we assist a fee? I mean we are extorting our own citizens. Isn’t that what congress, the house and the president did when they kept telling us if we didn’t pass the bailout plan we would suffer? Sounds like a mob tactic to me.

So in the end, we got the straight talk express whose priorities appear to be crooked and likes to call everyone “my friends.” And then we got Obama who presents himself very well but from what I have seen in the debates he never fully explains his answers so he really to me appears to be to Green, that meaning his stance is not known on a lot of things. Perhaps that is what we need, I don’t know, it’s up to the voters to decide. But at this time both the candidates appear to be focused on taxes and as of late “Joe the Plumber.” So I say unto you, raise my taxes if you show me what you are doing with my money. And no I am not a 6 digit income person. It sure would be nice but I manage my household , it seems like all the citizens of this country should demand the government manage their spending as well.

  • Share/Bookmark

McCain lost the campaign by himself.

October 8th, 2008
No Gravatar

John, come on man. You were going to win.  There is only one person that can blame on you losing the presidential race in 2008, and that “my friend” is you. Yes I am predicting that you will lose big time.

I was emailed this video below and watched it and am not surprised by the content. I’m sure Obama has similar ghosts in his closet but he really is to green for them to be easy to find. But still, after the debate last night which I feel McCain lost big time because he didn’t look confident, stumbled over his words and talked “around the issues” rather then directly answering them. Like “How do we fix social security?” And Mccain says “we all know how to fix it.” Then he goes on to talk about medicare. Ummm, how do we fix it John? And when? Then you look at the scandals Mccain has been associated with and the smear tactics palin has been told to use against Obama you have a mix where McCain can win at all.  Obama on the other hand looked confident. He was very presidential in the way he appeared and talked whereas McCain hobbled around the stage thanking everyone for coming and for such great questions which he would not answer completely.

Have I mentioned how much I hate politics? Anyway, the video is below regarding the McCain “Keating Economics” and then below it is another video from CNN’s truth squad to show the validity of Obama’s claim on McCain.

So is this all true? Here’s CNN’s truth squad investigating it. They say yes.

  • Share/Bookmark

Some of Palin's remarks stretch the truth

October 3rd, 2008
No Gravatar

Not to appear “biased” I’ll post some of Palin’s questionable statements during the VP debate. Regardless, According to one count Biden lied 14 times, Palin only made a few mistakes.

Daily News staff and wire report

(09/04/08 01:48:20)

Gov. Sarah Palin’s remarks to the Republican National Convention about her record in state government stretched the truth.

GAS PIPELINE

PALIN: “I fought to bring about the largest private-sector infrastructure project in North American history. And when that deal was struck, we began a nearly forty billion dollar natural gas pipeline to help lead America to energy independence. That pipeline, when the last section is laid and its valves are opened, will lead America one step farther away from dependence on dangerous foreign powers that do not have our interests at heart. THE FACTS: Palin implies that construction has begun on a major natural gas pipeline from the top of Alaska into Canada. That is not correct.

In fact, no building has begun and actual construction is years away, if it ever happens. This summer the Alaska Legislature, at Palin’s request, passed a bill under which the state will issue a “license” to a Canadian energy company, TransCanada Corp., and pay it up to $500 million as an incentive to someday build this enormous project, which Alaska politicians have long sought with little success. The license is not a construction contract, and federal energy regulators have not yet approved the project.

Palin also puts the price tag for the project at $40 billion, an exaggeration. This is roughly $10 billion more than most cost estimates industry players and consultants have made to date.

EARMARKS

PALIN: “I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending … and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress ‘thanks but no thanks’ for that Bridge to Nowhere.” THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million.

In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation, although she has cut, by more than half, the amount the state sought from Washington this year. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to Gravina Island, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a “bridge to nowhere.”

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Biden lied 14 times during the Biden / Palin Debate.

October 3rd, 2008
No Gravatar

Say it ain’t so Joe. But apparently he lied 14 times during the VP debate last night. Of course this is from the McCain website so who knows how accurate it may be but here they go.

Joe Biden’s 14 Lies

1. TAX VOTE: Biden said McCain voted “the exact same way” as Obama to increase taxes on Americans earning just $42,000, but McCain DID NOT VOTE THAT WAY.

2. AHMEDINIJAD MEETING: Joe Biden lied when he said that Barack Obama never said that he would sit down unconditionally with Mahmoud Ahmedinijad of Iran. Barack Obama did say specifically, and Joe Biden attacked him for it.

3. OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING: Biden said, “Drill we must.” But Biden has opposed offshore drilling and even compared offshore drilling to “raping” the Outer Continental Shelf.”

4. TROOP FUNDING: Joe Biden lied when he indicated that John McCain and Barack Obama voted the same way against funding the troops in the field. John McCain opposed a bill that included a timeline, that the President of the United States had already said he would veto regardless of it’s passage.

5. OPPOSING CLEAN COAL: Biden says he’s always been for clean coal, but he just told a voter that he is against clean coal and any new coal plants in America and has a record of voting against clean coal and coal in the U.S. Senate.

6. ALERNATIVE ENERGY VOTES: According to FactCheck.org, Biden is exaggerating and overstating John McCain’s record voting for alternative energy when he says he voted against it 23 times.

7. HEALTH INSURANCE: Biden falsely said McCain will raise taxes on people’s health insurance coverage — they get a tax credit to offset any tax hike. Independent fact checkers have confirmed this attack is false

8. OIL TAXES: Biden falsely said Palin supported a windfall profits tax in Alaska — she reformed the state tax and revenue system, it’s not a windfall profits tax.

9. AFGHANISTAN / GEN. MCKIERNAN COMMENTS: Biden said that top military commander in Iraq said the principles of the surge could not be applied to Afghanistan, but the commander of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force Gen. David D. McKiernan said that there were principles of the surge strategy, including working with tribes, that could be applied in Afghanistan.

10. REGULATION: Biden falsely said McCain weakened regulation — he actually called for more regulation on Fannie and Freddie.

11. IRAQ: When Joe Biden lied when he said that John McCain was “dead wrong on Iraq”, because Joe Biden shared the same vote to authorize the war and differed on the surge strategy where they John McCain has been proven right.

12. TAX INCREASES: Biden said Americans earning less than $250,000 wouldn’t see higher taxes, but the Obama-Biden tax plan would raise taxes on individuals making $200,000 or more.

13. BAILOUT: Biden said the economic rescue legislation matches the four principles that Obama laid out, but in reality it doesn’t meet two of the four principles that Obama outlined on Sept. 19, which were that it include an emergency economic stimulus package, and that it be part of “part of a globally coordinated effort with our partners in the G-20.”

14. REAGAN TAX RATES: Biden is wrong in saying that under Obama, Americans won’t pay any more in taxes then they did under Reagan.

  • Share/Bookmark

"One nation, under domestic financial terrorism…"

September 30th, 2008
No Gravatar

 I pledge allegiance to leaders,
       of the United States of America.

And to the scare tactics for which they use
       one nation, under domestic financial terrorism

with Fraud, Bail-outs and injustice to all…
as long as they are
large greedy corporations.

So, the economy needs a bailout huh? We can’t survive and won’t get paid without it right? Businesses are closing, merging and struggling to survive. We must go into debt $700 billion to help those greedy companies who screwed the nation. This isn’t democrat versus republican. This is the entire government losing it’s ever loving mind.

I for one don’t believe in the bailout. I think that if the government wants to give some money away then the companies getting the money need to put up some collateral. For example, all the real estate owned by the companies needing financing should be put on the line.

I mean come on, could you go the bank and get a loan without anything down? Nope, so why should wall street? After all its going to work right? So if they are so confident let’s get at least 5% collateral put down, let’s just get something even if it’s just 0.5%. What you don’t think so? Why not? Isn’t this going to work? If so no risk to them. But if it doesn’t why should the tax payers foot the trillion dollar bill for some companies whose CEO’s are walking away with golden parachutes in the millions.

Did you know that in the 60′s and 70′s a CEO making $11 million was making approx 10-20 times the average pay of a worker? Back then companies made profits. Now during these corrupt times company CEO’s are making 350 times the average worker. Gee I wonder why comapnies are failing.

Did you know one of these companies (WaMu) put a interim CEO in place for 17 days and the dude walked away with over 15 million dollars in compensation because of his parachute? How about that deal.

See, I don’t feel sorry about the bail out failing. The president and others are feeding us a load of dung telling us the world will come to an end, no one can get mortgages, car loans, paychecks, etc. The stock market will plummet, etc. But today I see that as of the time I write this the stock market rebounded 392.26 points, at one point it topped 400. Sure it’s only half of what it lost yesterday when we were being fed these stories but isn’t it interesting to see how the world rebounds and corrects itself? Amazingly no bailout and things are turning around.

I sure hope that regardless of what congress and the government chooses to do they don’t screw the American people for the sake of bailing out their friends on wall street. One of the first thing people are told is that when you invest there are risks. So what your portfolio is down $3,000. Does that mean you lost that much? Nope, not unless you sell. In fact now is a great time to buy more since stocks are so low. Don’t panic.

Isn’t what the government doing a strong arm, mob mentality? Give us $700 billion OR ELSE suffer the wrath.  You know what else I am sick of hearing? I am sick of them saying “our leaders this” and “our leaders that.” These people in office are NOT our leaders. They are our representatives, our employees and NOT our leaders. They are working for the people, not working above the people. I say it’s about time they start acting like it. I am thrilled that the bailout plan failed in the house. It gives me a bit of joy to see that these representatives are finally listening to the people that elected them. While they did vote the way the people wanted them to vote, it irritates me to think that many of them are up for re-election soon. Did they just vote “no” for self preservation to be re-elected? Or did they vote “no” because it was what the people they represent wanted?

Below is a screenshot showing just how well our economy is rebounding without government intervention. Isn’t it a beautiful thing?

Oh and John McCain. I liked you but I can’t vote for you. Obama is not much better on the bailout plan. In fact the following quote was retrieved from Capital Hill Blue

“This is something that all of us will swallow hard and go forward with. The option of doing nothing is simply not an acceptable option,” McCain said. Obama said he was inclined to back it “because I think Main Street is now at stake.”

I don’t think that McCain should have agreed and suspended his campaign to work on a plan to put the nation $700 billion more in debt so quick without any research or investigation. Instead it was rush rush rush to get the bailout plan completed. Obama did take the more laid back approach and said on “Face the Nation” that “my inclination would be to vote for it, understanding I’m not happy about it.”

So I do appreciate what Obama said and not taking a sudden stop to spend that amount of money. McCain on the other hand really messed up. If he is willing to spend $700billion in a few days how much will he spend if he does become president?  Let’s see, it took about one week to come up with the plan and try to pass it, so 52 weeks a year times 4 years in office = 208 chances to try to pass a $700 billion dollar plan. If it passed each time it would total $145,600,000,000,000.  Aren’t we as a nation trying to get out of debt?

And you know what else ticks me off? Why do we suddenly have $700billion for wall street bailouts, and yet it’s a well known fact I’ll never see a dollar of my money I paid into social security? Yep, we’ll bail out some greedy companies using tax payer money while we all know that social security is going bankrupt. What’s wrong with this picture? Talk about crooked priorities, but then again they are crooked companies and crooked politicians.

Can you even get a grasp for how much $700 billion is in terms of dollars?

One blog tried to explain:

700 billion M&Ms (at 2 grams per chocolatey orb) would be enough to fill 10 one-pound bags for every one of the 300 million Americans. That would be a popular bailout!

700 billion dollars could buy 2009 Lincoln Town Cars for every person in Vermont, North Dakota, Alaska, South Dakota, Delaware, Montana, Rhode Island, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Maine, and Idaho.

The combined weight of every human male in the world is considerably less than 700 billion pounds, even including the players in the NFL.

700 billion dollars could buy 87 McDonald’s combo meals for every person on Earth, with change left over for antacids.

My heart has beaten approximately 2,196,917, 208 times since I was born 58 years ago. At this rate, I’d have to live to live to be 20,300 years of age to reach 700 billion heartbeats. I’m willing to go for it, for the sake of research.

Federal expenditures to fight the entire World War II and run the rest of the country, adjusted to the 2000 dollars, were only $1.2 trillion.

  • Share/Bookmark